Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 04:19
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Apple details the end of Intel Mac support and a phaseout for Rosetta 2 - Ars Technica
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
6 million Chickens Dead and Counting - Daily Kos
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Voluptatibus nesciunt enim provident in.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
This Chinese Spacecraft Is Traveling to One of Earth’s Quasi-Moons - WIRED
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
According to Scientists, This Is the Most Important Thing To Restore Your Gut Health - SciTechDaily